4.5 Article

Comparison of the validity of the criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus by WHO and by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology by the outcomes of pregnancy

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 57-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8227(00)00135-2

Keywords

gestational diabetes mellitus; diagnostic criteria; complications of mother and infant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data for 416 Japanese pregnant women who received a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for determination of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in 13 hospitals in Japan were analyzed retrospectively. Comparison of the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) revealed pregnant women who met the latter criteria for GDM to have significantly higher incidences of low Apgar scores, respiratory problems, neonatal hypoglycemia, preterm delivery and requirements for insulin therapy and cesarean section. The women who met the WHO criteria but not the JSOG criteria had minor complications. These observations suggest that the GDM criteria of the JSOG are more appropriate than the WHO criteria from the standpoint of therapeutic intervention for pregnant women. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available