4.3 Article

The effects of physostigmine and cholinergic receptor ligands on novelty-induced neophobia

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages 1403-1412

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s007020070004

Keywords

physostigmine; hemicholinium; nicotinic and muscarinic ligands; neophobia; open field; rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to analyse in a well-established model of neophobia the effects of peripheral and central (ICV) administration of a prototypical and easily penetrating to the brain acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChE-I) - physostigmine, hemicholinium, a selective blocker of the high affinity choline uptake sites, as well as muscarinic and nicotinic receptor ligands. Thus, an attempt was made to address the question whether anxiolytic-like effects of AChE-I, reported in the clinic, are directly related to the anti-emotional action. The effects of peripherally and centrally administrated cholinergic ligands on novelty-induced decrease in exploratory behaviour were examined in rats. It was found that in a limited dose-range physostigmine and nicotine given peripherally or ICV selectively disinhibited rat exploration in the open field, whereas scopolamine stimulated animal motor activity and increased thigmotaxis. Locomotor effects of physostigmine and nicotine appeared at: the higher doses and could be easily separated from their anti-neophobic action. The rat's exploratory behaviour tended to be attenuated by central administration of hemicholinium (a choline uptake blocker), and it Mras significantly inhibited by mecamylamine (a nicotinic receptor antagonist), and pirenzepine (a selective M-1, receptor antagonist). Gallamine, a selective M-2 receptor antagonist, did not influence on animal novelty-induced anxiety-related behaviour. It is concluded that AChE-I can selectively affect brain emotional processes evoked by neophobia-related stimuli. Probably both nicotinic and M-1 cholinergic receptors mediate such an action of AChE-I.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available