4.3 Article

Heat shock protein expression is increased in cardiac and skeletal muscles of Fischer 344 rats after endurance training

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages 97-102

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-445X.2000.01894.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R29AG010871] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG10871] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are expressed when cells are exposed to various types of stress and they may provide protection against cellular insult. Previous data have shown increases in RSP expression following acute exhaustive exercise in rats (Locke et al. 1990, 1995; Salo et al. 1991) and humans (Liu et al. 1999); however, it is not known if chronic exercise will increase resting levels of HSPs. The purpose of this study was to determine if basal protein levels of HSP 72/73 and HSP 60 are increased in cardiac and skeletal muscle of endurance trained Fischer 344 rats. Heart, soleus (SOL) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles were removed and hearts were sectioned into left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV) and atria (AT). Endurance training improved myocardial citrate synthase activity by 88, 90 and 77% and cytochrome c oxidase activity by 58, 51 and 89% in LV, RV and AT, respectively. LV and RV oxidative enzyme activities were greater when compared to AT for both trained an? untrained rats (P < 0.05). HSP 72/73 expression was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in LV, RV and SOL from endurance trained versus from control rats (26, 45 and 67%, respectively). HSP 60 was also increased (P < 0.05) in LV, RV and SOL in trained relative to untrained rats. HSP 72/73 and HSP 60 were unchanged in AT and LC: after training. These results indicate that endurance training increases the basal expression of stress proteins and this observation is consistent with the hypothesis that endurance training may activate a protective mechanism to stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available