4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Remedy of chlorosis induced by iron deficiency in plants with the fungal siderophore rhizoferrin

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION
Volume 23, Issue 11-12, Pages 1991-2006

Publisher

MARCEL DEKKER INC
DOI: 10.1080/01904160009382160

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although microbial siderophores are characterized by high affinity and selectivity for Fe3+, they are usually less efficient as Fe-carriers to plants than synthetic chelates. An exception to this is rhizoferrin, a fungal siderophore produced by Rhizopus arrhizus isolated and purified by our group. A ferric complex of rhizoferrin was used in this study as an Fe source for tomato and cucumber (strategy I) and barley and corn (strategy II) plants grown in nutrient solutions. The Fe-rhizoferrin complex was found to be an efficient carrier of Fe to these plants. The efficiency of this chelate is comparable with that of the commonly used ferric complexes of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and ethylenediamine-di(o-hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (EDDHA). The application of Fe-rhizoferrin resulted in enhanced plant weight in barley and corn and higher leaf chlorophyll concentration in tomato, barley and corn. Iron uptake by Fe-stressed cucumber plants from the Fe-59 chelate of rhizoferrin and other chelators followed the order: EDDHA > rhizoferrin > EDTA greater than or equal to desferrioxamine B (DFOB); Fe-59 translocation from roots to shoots Followed the order: rhizoferrin = EDDHA > EDTA greater than or equal to DFOB. The high availability of Fe complexed by rhizoferrin for strategy I plants is related to its relatively high redox potential and low affinity to Fe2+. The high availability of Fe-rhizoferrin to strategy II plants is related to its relatively low apparent stability constant with Fe3+, which results in the ability of this compound to transfer Fe3+ via ligand exchange to the phytosiderophores which is specifically taken up by the roots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available