4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Molecular biology and cellular mechanisms of Brugada and long QT syndromes in infants and young children

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 177-181

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1054/jelc.2001.28865

Keywords

sudden infant death syndrome; arrhythmias; electrophysiology; congenital defects; heart disease

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 47678] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL047678, R55HL047678] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sudden cardiac death accounts for 19% of sudden deaths in children between I and 13 years of age and 30% of sudden deaths that occur between 14 anti 2 1 years of age. The incidence of sudden cardiac death displays 2 peaks: one between 45 and 75 years of age, as a result of coronary artery disease, and (lie other between birth and 6 months of age, caused by sudden infant death syndrome. The role of cardiac arrhythmias in sudden infant death syndrome has long been a matter of debate and the role of cardiac arrhythmias, in children in general is not well defined. Recent findings point to a contribution of primary electrical diseases of the heart including the Brugada and long QT syndromes to Sudden death in infants and children. Mutations in SCN5A and HERG and KvLQT1 have been shown to be associated with life-threatening arrhythmias and long QT intervals in young infants. These mutations cause changes in Sodium and potassium currents that amplify intrinsic electrical heterogeneities within the heart, thus providing a substrate as well as a trigger for the development of reentrant arrhythmias, including Torsade de Pointes (TdP), commonly associated with the long QT syndrome (LQTS). Mutations in SCN5A have also been shown to cause the sodium channel to turn off prematurely and thus to set the stage for the development of a rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada Syndrome. In LQTS, ion channel mutations cause a preferential prolongation of the M cell action potential that contributes to the development of long QT intervals, wide-based or notched T waves, and a large transmural dispersion of repolarization, which provides the substrate for the development of TdP. An early afterdepolarization-induced triggered beat is thought to provide the extrasystole that precipitates TdP. in the Brugada syndrome, mutations in SCN5A reduce sodium current density, causing premature repolarization of the epicardial action potential due to an all or none repolarization at the end of phase 1. The loss of the action potential dome in epicardium, but not endocardium, creates a dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall, resulting in a transmural voltage gradient that manifests in the electrocardiogram (ECG) as an ST-segment elevation and in the development of a vulnerable window during Which reentry Call be induced. Under these conditions, loss of the action potential dome at some epicardial sites but not Others gives rise to phase 2 reentry, which provides all extrasystole capable of precipitating ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (or rapid TdP). The practical importance of identifying infants and children with Brugada and LQTS syndromes lies in the fact that most deaths due to these congenital defects can be presented. A simple ECG is often sufficient to permit diagnosis and thus to prevent the development of life-threatening arrhythmic events. Mass ECG screening of neonates and children however has been the subject of debate focused oil issues ranging from the emotional impact of dealing with false positives to those concerning socio-economic and medico-legal factors. These issues are discussed in other articles. These concerns notwithstanding, it is important that we continue to question whether the economic inefficiencies Of Current screening methodologies Supersede the value of a young life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available