4.2 Review

Return of de-differentiation: why cancer is a developmental disease

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 58-62

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001622-200101000-00012

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many important advances have been made in the phenotypic and genetic characterization of malignant tumors since the publication of Peter Nowell's seminal article on the origin of cancer, but there has been no consistent effort to incorporate this wealth of knowledge into a general model of carcinogenesis. Current theoretical discussions on cancer are frequently dominated by attempts to categorize genetic alterations and phenotypic characteristics and establish correspondences between them. In this article, I argue, on the basis of recent data as well as old observations, that a developmental error leading to the acquisition of a unique cell character (de-differentiation) underlies all phenotypic characteristics of cancer cells and discuss how this notion can be reconciled with Nowell's model of carcinogenesis as a microevolutionary process into an updated theoretical description of cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2001, 13:58-62 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available