4.3 Article

Effect of caffeine co-ingested with carbohydrate or fat on metabolism and performance in endurance-trained men

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 137-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/eph8602072

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effect of caffeine co-ingested with either carbohydrate or fat on metabolism and performance in eight endurance-trained subjects who performed a random order of four experimental trials consisting of 120 min of steady-state ergometer cycling at 70% of maximal O-2 uptake (SS) followed by a time trial in which subjects completed a set amount of work (7 kJ kg(-1)) as quickly as possible. One hour before SS subjects ingested either 2.6 g kg(-1) carbohydrate (CHO); 2.6 g kg(-1) CHO + 6 mg kg(-1) caffeine (CHO + CAF); 1.2 g kg(-1) fat with 2000 U I.V. heparin (FAT); or 1.2 g kg(-1) fat with 2000 U I.V. heparin + 6 mg kg(-1) caffeine (FATS CAF). The rate of carbohydrate oxidation was higher (mu mol kg(-1) min(-1): CHO, 243 +/- 39 and CHO + CAF, 239 +/- 30 vs. FAT, 196 +/- 48 and FAT + CAF, 191 +/- 55; P < 0.05, values are means +/- S.D.) and the rate of fat oxidation lower (mol kg(-1) min(-1): CHO, 19 +/- 8 and CHO + CAF, 22 +/- 7 vs. FAT, 35 +/- 19 and FAT + CAF, 37 +/- 17; P < 0.05) with carbohydrate than fat ingestion. Yet despite lower carbohydrate use with fat feeding, the time taken to complete the time trial was less after carbohydrate than after fat ingestion (min: CHO, 30.37 +/- 7.42 and CHO + CAF, 29.12 +/- 5.62 vs. FAT, 33.02 +/- 8.50 and FAT + CAF, 32.78 +/- 7.70; P < 0.05). We conclude that (1) caffeine co-ingested with either carbohydrate or fat meals has no additive effect on substrate utilization or exercise performance and (2) carbohydrate ingestion before exercise improves subsequent time trial performance compared with fat ingestion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available