4.2 Article

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with sensitive low-grade lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 561-567

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1083-8791(01)70016-X

Keywords

AlloBMT; mantle cell lymphoma; event-free survival; transplantation-related morbidity; graft-versus-lymphoma effect; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; follicular lymphoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To report survival outcomes of allogeneic BMT in patients with low-grade lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients and Methods: Thirty-five patients with low-grade lymphoma (48%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (26%), or MCL (26%) underwent myeloablative allogeneic BMT from HILA-identical siblings at the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center. Patients had a median age of 46 years, a median of 2 prior treatments, and 31% were in complete remission at the time of transplantation. The preparative regimen was cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation for most patients. All grafts were T-cell depleted by counter flow centrifugal elutriation with CD34(+) augmentation. Results: The incidence of acute GVHD grade >2 was 6% and of grades 1 to 2 was 37%. The incidence of chronic GVHD was 6%. The median follow-up time was 25 months. The rate of event-free survival (EFS) was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-66%). Only 1 patient relapsed. The transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 46% for all patients. The TRM was 86% for patients with resistant disease and 14% for patients with sensitive disease and <2 prior treatments; rates of EFS were 0% (95% CI, 0%-0%) and 79% (95% CI, 47%-93%), respectively. Conclusion: These data show that, with T-cell depletion, the TRM and relapse rates are modest for patients with sensitive disease and <2 prior treatment courses. Thus, if there is a role for allogeneic BMT in the management of patients with these tumors, it is early in the course of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available