4.5 Article

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on clover and ryegrass grown together in a soil spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Journal

MYCORRHIZA
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 155-159

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s005720000071

Keywords

phosphorus uptake; plant competition; polluted soil; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; toxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) on white clover and ryegrass grown together in a soil spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) was assessed in a pot experiment. The soil was spiked with 500 mg kg(-1) anthracene, 500 mg kg(-1) chrysene and 50 mg kg(-1) dibenz(a,h)anthracene, representing common PAH compounds with three, four and five aromatic rings, respectively. Three treatments and two harvest times (8 and 16 weeks) were imposed on plants grown in spiked soil: no mycorrhizal inoculation, mycorrhizal inoculation (Glomus mosseae P2, BEG 69) and mycorrhizal inoculation and surfactant addition (Triton X-100). Pots without PAH were also included as a control of plant growth and mycorrhizal colonization as affected by PAH additions. The competitive ability of clover vis-g-vis ryegrass regarding shoot and root growth was enhanced by AM, but reduced by PAH and the added surfactant. This was reflected by mycorrhizal root colonization which was moderate for clover (20-40% of total root length) and very low for ryegrass (0.5-5% of total root length). Colonization of either plant was similar in spiked soil with and without the added surfactant, but the PAH reduced colonization of clover to half that in non-spiked soil. P uptake was maintained in mycorrhizal clover when PAH were added, but was reduced in non-mycorrhizal clover and in mycorrhizal clover that received surfactant. Similar effects were not observed on ryegrass. These results are discussed in the context of the natural attenuation of organic pollutants in soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available