4.6 Review

Neural development, cell-cell signaling, and the two-hit hypothesis of schizophrenia

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 457-476

Publisher

US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006887

Keywords

development; signaling; schizophrenia; genetics; teratogenesis; neuronal circuits

Categories

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R29HD029178, R01HD029178] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P50MH033127, P30MH033127] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-29178] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-33127] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To account for the complex genetics, the developmental biology, and the late adolescent/early adulthood onset of schizophrenia, the two-hit hypothesis has gained increasing attention. In this model, genetic or environmental factors disrupt early central nervous system (CNS) development. These early disruptions produce long-term vulnerability to a second hit that then leads to the onset of schizophrenia symptoms. The cell-cell signaling pathways involved in nonaxial induction, morphogenesis, and differentiation in the brain, as well as In the limbs and face, could be targets for a first hit during early development. These same pathways, redeployed for neuronal maintenance rather than morphogenesis, may be targets for a second hit in the adolescent or adult brain. Furthermore, dysregulation of cell-cell signaling by a first hit may prime the CNS for a pathologic response to a second hit via the same signaling pathway. Thus, parallel disruption of cell-cell signaling in both the developing and the mature CNS provides a plausible way of integrating genetic, developmental, and environmental factors that contribute to vulnerability and pathogenesis in schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available