4.6 Article

Improving the Visible Light Photocatalytic Aerobic Oxidation of Sulfides into Sulfoxides on Dye-Sensitized TiO2

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 10, Issue 20, Pages 4545-4554

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801304

Keywords

photocatalytic oxidation; visible light; titanium dioxide; TEMPO; sulfoxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503086, 21773173]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042018kf0212]
  3. Wuhan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visible light-driven interfacial redox reactions during dye-sensitized TiO2 are essential to meet the energy and environmental challenges in the form of dye-sensitized solar cells and sensitized degradation of organic pollutants. Inspired by these prior successes, it is conceivable that the underlying principles of these processes can guide us to construct selective chemical transformations in which the control of selectivity is in higher demand. We attempt to improve the selectivity for sulfoxides during the visible light-driven selective aerobic oxidation of sulfides in the merger of dye-sensitized TiO2 photocatalysis with TEMPO [(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl] catalysis. Thus, different factors like the TEMPO and its derivatives, initial O-2 pressures, initial sulfide concentrations, solvents, light-emitting diodes (LED) and TiO2 were examined to identify the critical factor for selectivity improvement. It was found that an easily synthesized anatase TiO2, sensitized by 0.33mol% of alizarin red S, was significant in improving the selectivity for sulfoxides at high conversions of sulfides with the aid of 2mol% of TEMPO as a redox mediator under blue LED irradiation. This work suggests that the engineering of the TiO2 materials can be a viable solution in improving the selectivity of visible light-driven chemical transformations by dye-sensitized TiO2 photocatalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available