4.6 Article

Nickel-Gallium Intermetallic Nanocrystal Catalysts in the Semihydrogenation of Phenylacetylene

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 824-831

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201300813

Keywords

hydrogenation; intermetallic phases; gallium; nanoparticles; nickel

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2011CBA00504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Scientific Fund from Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [20111001002]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZD1303]
  5. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists of the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemoselective hydrogenation of alkyne is of great importance in the chemical industry, in which intermetallic compounds (IMCs) have attracted extensive interest as efficient catalysts. Herein, we demonstrate the preparation of several supported Ni-Ga IMCs (Ni3Ga, Ni5Ga3, and NiGa) via a facile insitu reduction of layered double hydroxide (LDH) precursors, which demonstrate significantly improved catalytic activity and selectivity for the selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene to styrene. The composition and particle size of Ni-Ga IMCs can be tuned by adjusting the Ni/Ga ratio or reduction temperature during the topotactic transformation process of LDHs, and the best catalytic behavior can be obtained over the Ni3Ga IMC with a styrene yield of 87.7% (particle size=7.2nm at 40 degrees C and 0.3MPa), which is better than that of most of the reported Ni catalysts. The X-ray absorption fine-structure characterization and DFT calculations reveal the electron transfer from Ga to Ni and active-site isolation by Ga in Ni-Ga IMCs, which account for the excellent hydrogenation selectivity. The significantly improved catalytic performance makes Ni-Ga IMC catalysts promising candidates for the selective hydrogenation of alkyne.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available