4.6 Article

Ruthenium Oxide-Doped TiO2 Nanotubes by Single-Step Anodization for Water-Oxidation Applications

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 643-647

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402787

Keywords

anodization; nanotubes; ruthenium; titanium; water oxidation

Funding

  1. New and Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20113030040010]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2010-0011197]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20113030040010] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0011197] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-step anodization in NH4F-based ethylene glycol electrolyte containing KRuO4 and H2O led to the production of high-aspect-ratio TiO2 nanotubes (NTs) with a doping of ruthenium oxide. These NTs were successfully used as electrodes for water oxidation in KOH. This method offers homogenous incor poration of a small amount of ruthenium oxide (approximate to 0.12wt%) into 25m TiO2 nanotubes without the need for complicated facilities or steps. The addition of H2O into electrolytes is a key step for the stable adhesion of long-length TiO2 NT films on a substrate. The tips of the TiO2 nanotubes prepared by this novel method are not easily dissolved by electrolyte because the walls of the nanotubes are thickened by a factor of more than two in response to the addition of KRuO4 and H2O. The longest nanotubular TiO2 with a doping of ruthenium oxide and no wall dissolution shows the largest current density in the oxygen-evolution reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available