3.8 Article

Effect of group therapy for breast cancer on healthcare utilization

Journal

CANCER PRACTICE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 19-26

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.91005.x

Keywords

breast cancer; coping; depression; healthcare utilization; psychosocial intervention; support group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether participation in a group psychological intervention by patients with breast cancer would result in an improvement in psychological measures and in reduced billings in general medical expenses. Description of study: Eligible women who had completed treatment for stage 0, I, or II primary breast cancer were prospectively and randomly assigned to either the intervention (n = 46) or control (n = 43) group. Both groups received the usual psychosocial care; however, the intervention group also participated in six weekly cognitive/behavioural psychosocial meetings. All were assessed on psychiatric symptoms, mood, depression, and coping strategies at four time periods: preintervention, postintervention, 1-year follow-up, and 2-year follow-up. Alberta Healthcare billing records were obtained covering the 2-year follow-up period to determine the amount billed per person over the course of the study. Results: Women in the intervention group had less depression, less overall mood disturbance, better overall quality of life, and fewer psychiatric symptoms than those in the control group, beginning immediately postintervention and remaining so at 2-years postintervention. Billing in the intervention group was an average of $147 less than in the control group, a 23.5% reduction. Clinical implications: This is the first study to show that a psychosocial intervention can reduce direct healthcare billings in a sample of patients with cancer. Importantly, these findings help to justify the routine availability of such programs in cancer treatment facilities worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available