4.3 Article

Skewed distribution of morphological character scores and molecular markers in three interspecific crosses in Rosa section Caninae

Journal

HEREDITAS
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00001.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dogroses. Rosa section Caninae, are all polyploid and characterised by their unbalanced meiosis; the pollen parent contributes one genome. whereas the seed parent contributes 3 - 5 genomes depending upon ploidy level of the species. As a result, genetically determined traits are expected to be matroclinally inherited. In the present study, the transmittal of genetic material was studied using manually scored reproductive characters (ovary and sepals), automated image analysis of leaflet shape (Fourier coefficients), and molecular markers (RAPID). The plant material consisted of a pair of reciprocal crosses between R. sherurdii and R. villosa. a R. rubiginosa x R. sherardii cross and offspring obtained from selfing or within-population crosses of the parental species. All but one of the maternal markers were transmitted to all the offspring plants, whereas only 41 % of the paternal markers were transmitted to all of them, 23 % were never transmitted and 36 % reached only one or two of the offspring plants. Canonical variates analyses (CVA) based on the vegetative characters could easily separate the offspring groups representing parental species and also all three hybridogenous offspring groups from each other. whereas CVA based on reproductive characters failed to separate R. sherardii x R. villosa from its seed parent. but otherwise distinguished all offspring groups. The study shows that the expression of characters as well as molecular marker inheritance is dependent upon the direction of the cross, and on the species involved. It also demonstrates the importance of employing several different types of character sets for an improved comprehension of the effects of the peculiar canina meiosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available