4.5 Article

Adverse outcomes in pregnancies of asthmatic women: Results from a Canadian population

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 7-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00077-6

Keywords

asthma; pregnancy; adverse outcomes; teenage mothers; public health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: There has been little attention paid to asthma complicating pregnancy. This study is among the few studies that investigated this issue in a large Canadian population (more than two millions of Canadian pregnant women). METHODS: We carried out a historical cohort study using hospital discharge data collected by the Canadian Institute for Health Information for fiscal years 1989/90 to 1995/96. RESULTS: A total 2,017,553 obstetric deliveries were included in the analysis. Overall prevalence of asthma among these Canadian women were 0.43%, yielding a total of 8672 cases of asthmatic mothers. Maternal asthma was associated with all of the adverse pregnancy outcomes examined (including fetal death, preterm labour, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, antepartum hemorrhage, infection of the amniotic cavity, premature rupture of membrane, cesarean delivery, as well as postpartum hemorrhage), and adjustment for important confounding factors by multiple logistic regression analysis did not change the overall results. These associations were consistently observed in teenage and adult mothers, although the associations in teenage mothers tended to be stronger than in adult mothers. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that pregnant women with asthma are at substantially increased risk for many adverse pregnancy outcomes. For this reason, pregnant women with asthma are a particularly high-risk group to which extra attention, including increased efforts at education, monitoring, and optimal asthma management, may be appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available