4.0 Article

Atmospheric CO2 sequestration in restored mined peatlands

Journal

ECOSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 359-368

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2001.11682664

Keywords

peatland; restoration; carbon sequestration; hydrology; carbon dioxide; Kyoto Protocol

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comparing the net ecosystem CO2 exchange in natural, restored, and naturally regenerated peatlands assesses the significance of peatland restoration as a global biotic offset under the Kyoto Protocol. Maximum gross photosynthesis (GP) at the restored peatland (-17.5 g CO2 m(-2) d(-1)) was more than two times that at lawns in the natural peatland (-8.2 g CO2 m(-2) d(-1)) and almost three times that of the naturally regenerated peatland (-6.5 g CO2 m(-2) d(-1)). However, GP(max) at hummock sites (-18.1 g CO2 m(-2) d(-1)) in the natural peatland exceeded that of the restored peatland. Total rainfall during the study period was similar to 75% of the 30-year mean and these drier conditions resulted in all sites being a net source of atmospheric CO2 during the summer. From May 5 to August 23, 1998 respiration followed the trend: mined (398 g C m(-2)) > restored (169 g C m(-2)) > natural (138 g C m(-2)) peatland. While restoration did not return the net carbon sink function, it resulted in a significant decrease in the source of atmospheric CO2 (229 g C m(-2)) over the summer season. Approximately 70% of this decrease was due to the increase in gross ecosystem production, while the remaining 30% was due to a decrease in total respiration. The presence of Sphagnum mosses at the naturally regenerated peatland also resulted in a similar to 45% decrease in total respiration (soil and plants), indicating that an increase in volumetric soil moisture content during restoration has the potential to lower soil respiration at abandoned mined peatlands. Considering the area of drained and mined peatlands globally, peatland restoration on abandoned mined peatlands has the potential to represent an important biotic offset through enhanced carbon sequestration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available