4.6 Review

Empirically supported psychological, interventions: Controversies and evidence

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 685-716

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685

Keywords

empirically supported therapies; empirically validated treatments; psychotherapy efficacy; psychotherapy effectiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns about research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available