4.0 Article

Callosal contribution to procedural learning in children

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 253-272

Publisher

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A previous study in acallosal patients (De Guise, et al., 1999) has demonstrated the crucial role of the corpus callosum (CC) in a procedural learning task that requires the participation of both hemispheres. Because children often display limitations in interhemispheric communication linked to callosal immaturity, we expected that they would have difficulties learning a procedural skill that involved interhemispheric integration during its acquisition, but not when the skill was learned intrahemispherically. To test this hypothesis, 40 children, divided into 4 age groups (6 to 8 years, 9 to 11 years, 12 to 14 years, and 15 to 16 years), performed a modified version of the serial reaction time task developed by Nissen and Bullemer (1987). This task involves uni- or bimanual key-pressing responses to a fixed sequence of 10 visual stimuli that are repeated 80 times. All the children were able to learn the visuomotor skill in the unimanual condition and to transfer it interhemispherically. However, only the older children (12 years and over) learned the task in the bimanual (interhemispheric) condition. The results indicate that the maturation of the CC affects interhemispheric acquisition of a procedural skill in two different ways: While the immature CC appears to be sufficient to transfer a skill acquired by one hemisphere, a mature CC seems to be required to learn the skill bihemispherically. The latter skill was achieved around the age of 12, coinciding with the end of the maturation cycle of the CC. Although the young children were unable to learn the bimanual task implicitly, some of them showed explicit knowledge of the procedure, confirming once again the dissociation between explicit and implicit memory suggested by Squire (1992).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available