4.6 Article

Hemiparetic gait parameters in overground versus treadmill walking

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 105-112

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/154596830101500204

Keywords

stroke; rehabilitation; hemiparetic gait; treadmill; gait symmetry

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R29AG014487] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R29AG14487-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Hemiparetic gait is characterized by high stride-cycle variability, diminished stance time, single-limb stance time, and stance/swing ratio in the paretic limb. Recent studies suggest treadmill (TM) training may improve the motor control underlying these variables, but supporting evidence is sparse. Methods: This study compared gait patterns of untrained chronic hemiparetic stroke patients (n = 18; mean, 39.5 months poststroke) during overground (OG) and TM walking at matched velocities. Variables included relative stance time, relative single-limb stance time, stance/swing ratio, peak force, and impulse. Within-subject variability of these measures (CV) was used to assess gait pattern stability. Results: OG and TM cycle durations were similar, but CVs differed (TM < OG, p < 0.05). In the paretic limb, differences were seen in relative stance time, relative single,limb stance time, and stance/swing ratio, respectively (TM > OG, p < 0.05). These variables decreased in the nonparetic limb during TM walking (p < 0.05 for all). Improved interlimb symmetry and coordination were evidenced by decreased between-limb differences and improved relative temporal phasing, respectively, in the TM condition (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Collectively, these results demonstrate that the TM induces an immediate alteration toward a more consistent and symmetric gait pattern. Further investigation is needed to determine whether TM training leads to motor relearning and neuroplasticity in chronic hemiparetic subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available