4.4 Article

Immunohistochemical expression of caspase-3 as an adverse indicator of the clinical outcome in human breast cancer

Journal

PATHOBIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 266-273

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000064337

Keywords

caspase-3; immunohistochemistry; breast cancer; apoptosis; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Tumor growth is the net result of cell proliferation and cell loss by apoptosis. Caspase-3 (CPP32) has been considered as most directly correlated with apoptosis because of its location in the protease cascade pathway. The aim of this study was to examine the relation of the immunohistochemical expression of caspase-3 in 137 infiltrating breast carcinomas to patients' clinicopathological parameters and survival. Method: A polyclonal antibody against caspase-3 was applied using a standard immunohistochemical procedure to paraffin sections. Results: By comparison with nonneoplastic breast tissue, caspase-3 appeared to be upregulated in malignant breast tissue, and its overexpression status was detected in 75.2% of the specimens. Significant statistical correlations were observed between overexpression of caspase-3 and low nuclear grade (p = 0.048), lack of p53 protein accumulation (p = 0.039), bcl-2-positive immunostaining (p = 0.027), as well as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 immunoreactivity of neoplastic (p = 0.012) and stromal cells (p = 0.0001). Despite the above correlations, multivariate analysis revealed a significant negative influence of caspase-3 expression on patients' overall survival (p = 0.029). Conclusions: Caspase-3 protein overexpression appears to be involved in the apoptotic pathways influenced by wild-type p53 and bcl-2 proteins. Moreover, the results show that caspase-3 overexpression in breast cancer cells seems to exert an independent adverse effect on patients' overall survival. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available