4.0 Article

Nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among Latinos in the USA: Influence of language

Journal

ECOLOGY OF FOOD AND NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 321-345

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03670244.2001.9991657

Keywords

children; food intake; Food Guide Pyramid; food labels; Hispanic; language; Latino; nutrition knowledge; obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study are to: (a) assess Latino's nutrition knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and sources of nutrition information, and (b) examine the association of these with language use at home. Household-to-house hold interviews were conducted in five predominantly Latino neighborhoods in Hartford, Connecticut in households with at least one child less than or equal to 12 years of age. The typical Latina respondent was a woman in her early 30s who was the mother of at least one child living in the household (N = 426). The vast majority of Latinos were Puerto Rican (95.8%) and they spoke only Spanish (41.8%), only English (6.1%) or both English and Spanish (52.1%) at home. As many as 73.9% of respondents received food stamps and only 9.2% had more than high school education. Respondents were familiar with the USDA's Food Guide Pyramid (93.4%) and with food labels (93.7%). Fifteen percent knew the recommended servings for breads and cereals and 18.3% reported reading food labels always. Respondents had a positive nutrition attitude but lacked specific knowledge of terms such as saturated fat and neural tube defects, and were unable to identify good food sources of folate, calcium, and vitamin A. Friends/relatives, doctor, WIC, and television were the main sources of nutrition information. Speaking only Spanish at home (vs English or English and Spanish) was associated with nutrition knowledge and attitudes, and a more traditional pattern of food consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available