4.5 Article

Piroxicam and NS-398 rescue neurones from hypoxia/reoxygenation damage by a mechanism independent of cyclo-oxygenase inhibition

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 480-489

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00065.x

Keywords

free radicals; in vitro; mitogen-activated protein kinase; neurofilaments; prostaglandins; superoxide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied whether NS-398, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme inhibitor, and piroxicam, an inhibitor of COX-2 and the constitutively expressed COX-1, protect neurones against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Rat spinal cord cultures were exposed to hypoxia for 20 h followed by reoxygenation. Hypoxia/reoxygenation increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, which was inhibited by piroxicam (180-270 muM) and NS-398 (30 muM). Cell counts confirmed the neuroprotection. Western blotting revealed no COX-1 or COX-2 proteins even after hypoxia/reoxygenation. Production of prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)), a marker of COX activity, was barely measurable and piroxicam and NS-398 had no effect on the negligible PGE(2) production. Hypoxia/reoxygenation increased nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) binding activity, which was inhibited by piroxicam but not by NS-398. AP-1 binding activity after hypoxia/reoxygenation was inhibited by piroxicam but strongly enhanced by NS-398. However, both COX inhibitors induced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in neurones and phosphorylation of heavy molecular weight neurofilaments, cytoskeletal substrates of ERK. It is concluded that piroxicam and NS-398 protect neurones against hypoxia/reperfusion. The protection is independent of COX activity and not solely explained by modulation of NF-KB and AP-1 binding activity. Instead, piroxicam and NS-398-induced phosphorylation through ERK pathway may contribute to the increased neuronal survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available