4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or post partum: A population-based, case-control study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 2, Pages 104-110

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.107919

Keywords

deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; pregnancy; puerperium

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL060279] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR030582] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL46974, HL60279] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR30582] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or post partum. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a population-based case-control study. All Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with a first lifetime deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or post partum from 1966 to 1990 were identified (N = 90). Where possible, a resident without deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was matched to each patient by dale of the first live birth after the patient's child. The medical records of all remaining patients and all control subjects were reviewed for >25 baseline characteristics, which were tested as risk factors for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis smoking (odds ratio, 2.4) and prior superficial vein thrombosis (odds ratio, 9.4) were independent risk factors for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thrombosis during pregnancy or post partum. CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may be warranted for pregnant women with prior superficial Vein thrombosis. Smoking cessation should be recommended, especially during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available