4.4 Article

In vitro Characterization of Enzymes Involved in the Synthesis of Nonproteinogenic Residue (2S,3S)-β-Methylphenylalanine in Glycopeptide Antibiotic Mannopeptimycin

Journal

CHEMBIOCHEM
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages 2480-2487

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200900351

Keywords

amino acids; diastereoselectivity; mannopeptimycin; methyltransferases; nonribosomal peptide synthetases

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC 98-2311-B-001-014-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mannopeptimycin, a potent drug lead, has superior activity against difficult-to-treat multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). (2S,3S)-beta-Methylphenylalanine is a residue in the cyclic hexapeptide core of mannopeptimycin, but the synthesis of this residue is far from clear. We report here on the reaction order and the stereochemical course of reaction in the formation of (2S,3S)-beta-methylphenylalanine. The reaction is executed by the enzymes MppJ and TyrB, an S-adenosyl methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase and an (S)-aromatic-amino-acid aminotransferase, respectively. Phenylpyruvic acid is methylated by MppJ at its benzylic position at the expense of one equivalent of SAM. The resulting beta-methyl phenylpyruvic acid is then converted to (2S,3S)-beta-methylphenylalanine by TyrB. MppJ was further determined to be regioselective and stereoselective in its catalysis of the formation of (3S)-beta-methylphenylpyruvic acid. The binding constant (K-D) of MppJ versus SAM is 26 mu m. The kinetic constants with respect to k(cat) (Ppy) and K-M Ppy and k(cat) (SAM) and K-M (SAM) are 0.8 s(-1) and 2.5 mM, and 8.15 s(-1) and 0.014 mm, respectively. These results suggest SAM has higher binding affinity for MppJ than Ppy, and the C-C bond formation in beta mPpy might be the rate-limiting step, as opposed to the C-S bond breakage in SAM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available