4.5 Article

Perceived exertion is associated with an altered brain activity during exercise with progressive hyperthermia

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 2017-2023

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2017

Keywords

electroencephalography; electromyography; core temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study tested the hypothesis that perceived exertion during prolonged exercise in hot environments is associated with changes in cerebral electrical activity rather than changes in the electromyogram (EMG) of the exercising muscles. Therefore, electroencephalogram (EEG) in three positions (frontal, central, and occipital cortex), EMG, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and core temperature were measured in 14 subjects during submaximal exercise in normal (18 degreesC, control) and hot (40 degreesC, hyperthermia) environments. RPE increased from 11 +/- 1 units at 5 min to 20 +/- 0 units at exhaustion (50 +/- 3 min) in the trial with progressive hyperthermia, whereas exercise in the control trial was maintained with a stable core temperature for 1 h without exhausting the subjects. Altered EEG activity was observed in all electrode positions, and stepwise forward-regression analysis identified core temperature and a frequency index of the EEG over the frontal cortex as the best predictors of RPE. In contrast, there were no significant correlations between RPE and any of the measured EMG parameters (median spectral frequency, root mean square, or amplitude), and the EMG parameters were not different in hyperthermia compared with control. Thus hyperthermia does not seem to affect the activation pattern of the muscles. Rather, the linear correlation among core temperature, EEG frequency index, and RPE indicates that alterations in cerebral activity may be associated with the hyperthermia-induced development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in hot environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available