4.5 Article

Pedunculopontine stimulation induces prolonged activation of pontine reticular neurons

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 455-465

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00094-X

Keywords

locomotion; nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis; nucleus reticularis pontis oralis; reticular activating system; sleep

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS20246] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS020246] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular and intracellular recordings were carried out from neurons in the region of the pontine reticular formation at the transition between the nucleus reticularis pontis oralis and caudalis. and in the pontis caudalis. Responses were studied after stimulation of the mesopontine cholinergic pedunculopontine nucleus in precollicular-postmammillary transected, paralyzed preparations. Recordings of neurographic activity in hindlimb flexor and er;tensor nerves served to detect changes in fictive locomotion and muscle tone induced by pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation or occurring spontaneously. Short duration trains of pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation induced long lasting responses, on average over 12s in duration, in one-third of pontine reticular neurons. These prolonged responses were stimulation frequency-dependent such that the longest durations were induced by stimulation at 20-60 Hz. In some cells, stimulation at lower (10 Hz) or higher (100 Hz) frequencies induced responses of shorter duration or were absent, while in others, higher frequencies prolonged the excitatory effects of pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation. We conclude that these stimulation frequency-dependent effects may be related to the modulation of postural muscle tone and locomotion by the pedunculopontine nucleus. (C) 2001 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available