4.8 Article

Insulin/IGF-1 and TNF-alpha stimulate phosphorylation of IRS-1 at inhibitory Ser(307) via distinct pathways

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages 181-189

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI10934

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR002635] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK040605, R01DK040936] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 02635] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK040936, R01 DK 40605] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 might inhibit insulin signaling, but the relevant phosphorylation sites are difficult to identify in cultured cells and to validate in isolated tissues. Recently, we discovered that recombinant NH2-terminal Jun kinase phosphorylates IRS-1 at Ser(307), which inhibits insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1. To monitor phosphorylation of Ser(307) in various cell and tissue backgrounds, we prepared a phosphospecific polyclonal antibody designated alpha pSer(307). This antibody revealed that TNF-alpha, IGF-1, or insulin stimulated phosphorylation of IRS-1 at Ser(307) in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and adipocytes. Insulin injected into mice or rats also stimulated phosphorylation of Ser(307) on IRS-1 immunoprecipitated from muscle; moreover, Ser(307) was phosphorylated in human muscle during the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Experiments in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and adipocytes revealed that insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Ser(307) was inhibited by LY294002 or wortmannin, whereas TNF-alpha -stimulated phosphorylation was inhibited by PD98059. Thus, distinct kinase pathways might converge at Ser(307) to mediate feedback or heterologous inhibition of IRS-1 signaling to counterregulate the insulin response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available