3.8 Article

Mouse paracentric inversion In(3)55Rk mutates the urate oxidase gene

Journal

CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS
Volume 93, Issue 1-2, Pages 77-82

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000056953

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA034196] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P40RR001183] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM046697] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCI NIH HHS [CA34196] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NCRR NIH HHS [P40 RR01183] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM46697] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paracentric inversion In(3)55Rk on mouse Chromosome 3 (Chr 3) was induced by cesium irradiation. Genetic crosses indicate the proximal breakpoint cosegregates with D3Mit324and D3Mit92; the distal breakpoint cosegregates with D3Mit127. D3Mit160, and D3Mit200. Giemsa-banded chromosomes show the inversion spans similar to 80% of Chr 3. The proximal breakpoint occurs within band 3A2, not 3B as reported previously; the distal breakpoint occurs within band 3H3. Mice homozygous for the inversion exhibit nephropathy indicative of uricase deficiency. Southern blot analyses of urate oxidase, Uox, show two RFLPs of genomic mutant DNA: an EcoRI site between exons 4-8 and a BamHI site 3' to exon 6. Mutant cDNA fails to amplify downstream of base 844 at the 3' end of exon 7. FISH analysis of chromosomes from inversion heterozygotes, using a cosmid clone containing genomic wild-type DNA for Uox exons 2-4, shows that a 5' segment of the mutated Uox allele on the inverted chromosome has been transposed from the distal breakpoint region to the proximal breakpoint region. Clinical, histopathological, and Northern analyses indicate that our radiation-induced mutation, uox(ln), is a putative null. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available