4.7 Article

Stability of the preclinical episodic memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 96-102

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.1.96

Keywords

preclinical Alzheimer's disease; episodic memory; recall; recognition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to determine the course of the preclinical episodic memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease. Using data from a population-based study, we compared persons who developed Alzheimer's disease (n = 15) with persons who were non-demented (n = 105) 6 and 3 years prior to the diagnosis of dementia. Participants were tested on tasks assessing episodic memory (free recall and recognition of words) and short-term memory (digit span). The incident Alzheimer's disease cases performed more poorly than their non-demented counterparts both 3 and 6 years before diagnosis on recall and recognition. There were no group differences in either forward or backward digit span, The selective impairment of episodic memory before the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is consistent with the view that early changes in the hippocampal complex play an important role in the memory deficit in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. On both preclinical measurement occasions, recall and recognition made independent contributions to group classification in logistic regression analyses. However, there was no evidence for accelerated decline of episodic memory in the incident Alzheimer's disease group from 6 to 3 years before diagnosis. These results indicate that Alzheimer's disease is characterized by a long preclinical period during which episodic memory deficits are detectable. The magnitude of these deficits appears to be quite stable, at least up to 3 years before diagnosis. This may reflect the fact that those biological events that eventually result in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (e.g. the appearance of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) accumulate at a relatively slow rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available