The effect of matrix toughness and loading rate on the mode-II interlaminar fracture toughness of glass-fibre/vinyl-ester composites

Glass-fibre-reinforced composites are increasingly used for structural applications. However, like high-performance carbon-fibre composites, they are susceptible to mode-II-dominated delamination. In response to this problem, this paper investigates the effect of matrix toughness and loading rate on the mode-II interlaminar fracture toughness (G(IIc)) of unidirectional glass-fibre composites with brittle and rubber-toughened vinyl ester matrices. Mode II tests were conducted on end-notch-flexure (ENF) specimens at test rates ranging from 1 mm/min to 3 m/s. The G(IIc) results were compared to the order of matrix G(Ic). There was no significant effect of loading rate or matrix toughness on G(IIc). The absence of a loading rate effect is consistent with the bulk of the experimental data in the literature, but the absence of a matrix effect is not. Microscopic examination of fracture surfaces shows similar matrix deformation in each composite. The through-thickness matrix deformation zone size is also similar. These observations suggest similar energy absorption in each composite and hence support the G(IIc) test results. II is concluded that failure is interface controlled, whereby unstable fracture is initiated after a similarly short period of crack growth in each composite, and before an increase in , as a result of increased matrix toughness becomes apparent. The G(IIc) results indicate that the use of rubber-toughened vinyl ester matrices in glass-fibre composites will not improve resistance to impact-induced mode II-delamination. However, through-thickness impact damage in composite structures is likely to result from mixed-mode (I/II) loading. Therefore, suggestions for future work include investigation of the matrix effect on mixed-mode (I/II) interlaminar fracture toughness, and on delamination resistance of plate structures subjected to transverse low-velocity impact, (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd, All rights reserved.