4.6 Article

Melatonin secretion occurs at a constant rate in both young and older men and women

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.1.E11

Keywords

endogenous melatonin; nocturnal secretion; young and elderly subjects; amount of melatonin; rate of secretion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The magnitude and duration of melatonin (MLT) secretion were measured over a period of 25 h with pharmacokinetic studies employing administration of D-7 MLT at midday and at midnight in two separate studies and two groups of subjects, 12 young and 11 older men and women. Plasma levels of endogenous MLT and D7 MLT were quantified separately by use of a specific and sensitive method (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) previously developed in our laboratory, enabling us to measure endogenous and exogenous MLT levels down to 0.5 pg/ml in plasma. In the two groups of subjects, MLT secretion occurred only at night: onset time of secretion was from 1915 to 2205 (Greenwich mean time), and offset was from 0305 to 0545. No MLT peak was observed in individual nocturnal MLT profiles that were similar to curves obtained for a rate-constant infusion. Modelization demonstrated the superimposition of observed data and simulated curves. MLT concentrations decreasing from the offset of secretion might correspond to the elimination of MLT present in the body at the end of nocturnal secretion. By use of the MLT clearance given by pharmacokinetics, the amount of secreted MLT was found to be 35.7 and 21.6 mug for men and women, respectively, and the rate of secretion was 4.6 and 2.8 mug/h, respectively. No significant gender difference was observed for these two parameters when normalized to body weight. No significant gender difference was observed for onset times of secretion or duration of secretion (7.6-8.6 h) within the two groups, or between young and older subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available