4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Limitations and perspectives about scaling ozone impacts in trees

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 373-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00228-7

Keywords

O-3; CO2; maturation; nutrients; nutrition; scaling; tree ontogeny

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review the need for scaling effects of ozone (O-3) from juvenile to mature forest trees, identify the knowledge presently available, and discuss limitations in scaling efforts. Recent findings on O-3/soil nutrient and O-3/CO2 interactions from controlled experiments suggest consistent scaling patterns for physiological responses of individual leaves to whole-plant growth, carbon allocation, and water use efficiency of juvenile trees. These findings on juvenile trees are used to develop hypotheses that are relevant to scaling O-3 effects to mature trees, and these hypotheses are examined with respect to existing research on differences in response to O-3 between juvenile and mature trees. Scaling patterns of leaf-level physiological response to O-3 have not been consistent in previous comparisons between juvenile and mature trees. We review and synthesize current understanding of factors that may cause such inconsistent scaling patterns, including tree-size related changes in environment, stomatal conductance, O-3 uptake and exposure, carbon allocation to defense, repair, and compensation mechanisms, and leaf production phenology. These factors should be considered in efforts to scale O-3 responses during tree ontogeny. Free-air O-3 fumigation experiments of forest canopies allow direct assessments Of O-3 impacts on physiological processes of mature trees, and provide the opportunity to test current hypotheses about ontogenetic variation in O-3 sensitivity by comparing O-3 responses across tree-internal scales and ontogeny. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available