4.6 Article

Evaluation of pancreatic secretion after administration of secretin: Application of magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 87-92

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE ASIA
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2001.02391.x

Keywords

exocrine; magnetic resonance; pancreas; secretin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To evaluate pancreatic exocrine function, we measured the changes in T-2 enhanced hydrograhic intensity on magnetic resonance (MR) images of the pancreas following an injection of secretin, which is representative of the changes in duodenal fluid volume. Methods: The subjects were 10 patients with normal pancreatic function (N > 70% detected by using a pancreatic function diagnostant test) and 12 patients with hypo-function, including those with mild hypo-function (MH, 50-70%, six patients) and severe hypo-function (SH < 50%, six patients). Results: In the N group, T-2 enhanced intensity of the pancreas increased to a maximum value (more than 10% compared with baseline) within 5 min of stimulation, then gradually decreased. No significant difference in the response was observed between the head and body of the pancreas. Changes in the MH group were similar to those of the N group. In contrast, significantly lower changes in T-2 enhanced intensity were observed in SH group, relative to both the N and MH group (P < 0.05). The amount of secretin-induced increase in duodenal fluid after 16 min was not significantly different among the three groups. Furthermore, an evaluation of the residual pancreatic tissue after a pancreatoduodenectomy was also feasible. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the MR-secretin test is useful for the evaluation of severe pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. The diagnostic test is simple, direct and non-invasive. (C) 2001 Blackwell Science Asia Pry Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available