4.7 Article

Effects of membrane cholesterol on the sensitivity of the GABA(A) receptor to GABA in acutely dissociated rat hippocampal neurones

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 178-184

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00159-3

Keywords

GABA(A) receptor; GABA; cholesterol; methyl-beta-cyclodextrin; patch-clamp; hippocampal neurone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of membrane cholesterol on the GABA(A) receptor were investigated in acutely dissociated rat hippocampal neurones, using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Neuronal cholesterol was manipulated within the range 56-250% control by incubation with methyl-beta -cyclodextrin for depletion and a complex of cholesterol and methyl-beta -cyclodextrin for enrichment. Manipulation over a narrower range was achieved with cholesterol + phosphatidylcholine liposomes. A complex of epicholesterol and methyl-beta -cyclodextrin was used to insert epicholesterol. Cholesterol enrichment reduced the potency of GABA, as did cholesterol depletion, with increases in EC50 of up to 4-fold. Cholesterol enrichment reduced the potency of the competitive antagonist bicuculline but did not affect that of the non-competitive antagonist picrotoxinin. Cholesterol depletion did not affect the potencies of either antagonist. Epicholesterol substituted functionally for cholesterol with respect to the effects of enrichment. In cholesterol-depleted neurones, however, only incubation with cholesterol was able to restore GABA potency to normal. These results suggest a specific requirement for cholesterol at control levels to maintain optimal GABA potency, which may involve specific binding of cholesterol to the GABA(A) receptor. The reduction in GABA potency by enrichment with cholesterol or epicholesterol is more likely to be due to reduced plasma membrane fluidity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available