4.3 Article

Thrombotic Stroke in the Anesthetized Monkey (Macaca mulatta): Characterization by MRI - A Pilot Study

Journal

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 329-339

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000335309

Keywords

Animal models; Embolic stroke; Focal ischemia; Middle cerebral artery occlusion; Methods; Monkey; MRI; Thrombin

Funding

  1. INSERM
  2. University of Caen-Basse Normandie
  3. Regional Council of Lower Normandy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The lack of a relevant stroke model in large nonhuman primates hinders the development of innovative diagnostic/therapeutic approaches concerned with this cerebrovascular disease. Our objective was to develop a novel and clinically relevant model of embolic stroke in the anesthetized monkey that incorporates readily available clinical imaging techniques and that would allow the possibility of drug delivery including strategies of reperfusion. Methods: Thrombin was injected into the lumen of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 12 anesthetized (sevoflurane) male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Sequential MRI studies (including angiography, FLAIR, PWI, DWI, and gadolinium-enhanced T1W imaging) were performed in a 3T clinical MRI. Physiological and biochemical parameters were monitored throughout the investigations. Results: Once standardized, the surgical procedure induced transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in all operated animals. All animals studied showed spontaneous reperfusion, which occurred some time between 2 h and 7 days post-ictus. Eighty percent of the studied animals showed diffusion/perfusion mismatch. The ischemic lesions at 24 h spared both superficial and profound territories of the MCA. Some animals presented hemorrhagic transformation at 7 days post-ictus. Conclusion: In this study, we developed a pre-clinically relevant model of embolic stroke in the anesthetized nonhuman primate. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available