4.4 Article

Combined effect of heat stress, dehydration and exercise on neuromuscular function in humans

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 1-2, Pages 87-94

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s004210000339

Keywords

running; heat stress; dehydration; muscle; strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the combined effect of exercise induced hyperthermia and dehydration on neuromuscular function in human subjects. Six trained male runners ran for 40 min on a treadmill at 65% of their maximal aerobic velocity while wearing a tracksuit covered with an impermeable jacket and pants to impair the evaporation of sweat. These stressful experimental running conditions led the runners to a physiological status close to exhaustion. On average, the 40 min run ended at a heart rate of 196 (SD 8) beats . min(-1), a tympanic temperature of 40 (SD 0.3) degreesC and with a loss of body mass of 2 (SD 0.5)%. Pre- and post-running strength tests included measurements of maximal knee extension and flexion torques in both isometric and isokinetic (at 60 and 240 degrees . s(-1)) conditions. A 20 s endurance test at 240 degrees . s(-1) was also performed. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from six knee extensor and flexor muscles during the entire protocol. The treadmill run led to clear decrements in maximal extension torque and EMG activity both in isometric and at the slowest isokinetic velocity (60 degrees . s(-1)). However, no differences in these parameters were observed at 240 degrees . s(-1) Furthermore, the EMG patterns of the major knee extensor and flexor muscles remained remarkably stable during the treadmill run. These results demonstrate that the exercise-induced hyperthermia and dehydration in the present experiments had only minor effects on the neuromuscular performance. However, it is also suggested that high internal body temperature per se could limit the production of high force levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available