4.5 Article

Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis-1 patients with spinal deformities

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 823-827

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s001980170032

Keywords

bone mineral density; bone mineral turnover; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; neurofibromatosis-1; spinal deformities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cross-sectional study was carried out to obtain data on the bone mineral density status of a group of neurofibromatosis-1 patients with spinal deformities, and to search for possible accompanying changes in the bone mineral turnover. Neurofibromatosis-1 is a here-dofamiliar disorder that is associated with a variety of skeletal anomalies (mostly spinal deformities) in 10-50% of patients. Intraoperatively, a poor vertebral bone quality has been observed. Efforts have been made to identify factors preventing curve progression, to optimize operational planning and to explain the pathomechanism. As part of the preoperative evaluation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in 12 patients with neurofibromatosis- 1, supplemented by laboratory blood/urine investigations. A significant decrease in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine was measured. An inverse relation was suggested between the severity of scoliosis and the lumbar spine Z-scores. No pivotal alterations were identified in the laboratory measurements. The bony tissue abnormality observed intraoperatively in neurofibromatosis-1 patients may be described as a diminution of the axial bone mineral density. The biochemical parameters do not support the presence of hyperparathyroidism, renal disorders or other associated diseases influencing the bone mineral turnover. The evaluation of bone mineral density in the course of the preoperative planning is proposed in neurofibromatosis-1; the exact background and the role of a possible osteoporosis in the prognosis remain to be elucidated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available