4.6 Article

Web-Based Tailored Intervention for Preparation of Parents and Children for Outpatient Surgery (WebTIPS): Formative Evaluation and Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume 120, Issue 4, Pages 915-922

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000632

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01HD056104-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this 2-phase project was to conduct a formative evaluation and to test the preliminary efficacy of a newly developed Web-based Tailored Intervention for Preparation of parents and children undergoing Surgery (WebTIPS). METHODS: Phase 1 enrolled 13 children 2 to 7 years of age undergoing outpatient elective surgery and their parents for formative evaluation of WebTIPS. Parent participation focus groups are common in qualitative research and are a method of asking research participants about their perceptions and attitudes regarding a product or concept. In phase 2, children 2 to 7 years of age in 2 medical centers were assigned randomly to receive the WebTIPS program (n = 38) compared with children receiving the standard of care (n = 44). The primary outcome of phase II was child and parent preoperative anxiety. RESULTS: In phase 2, parents reported WebTIPS to be both helpful (P < 0.001) and easy to use (P < 0.001). In phase 2, children in the WebTIPS group (36.2 +/- 14.1) were less anxious than children in the standard of care group (46.0 +/- 19.0) at entrance to the operating room (P = 0.02; Cohen d = 0.59) and introduction of the anesthesia mask (43.5 +/- 21.7 vs 57.0 +/- 21.2, respectively, P = 0.01; Cohen d = 0.63). Parents in the WebTIPS group (32.1 +/- 7.4) also experienced less anxiety compared with parents in the control group (36.8 +/- 7.1) in the preoperative holding area (P = 0.004; Cohen d = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: WebTIPS was well received by parents and children and led to reductions in preoperative anxiety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available