4.3 Article

Progressive Gray Matter Atrophy in Lacunar Patients with Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment

Journal

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 157-166

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000316059

Keywords

Mild cognitive impairment; Lacunar infarcts; Structural magnetic resonance; Neuropsychology

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya [2005SGR00855]
  2. Fundacion Mapfre Medicina
  3. University of Barcelona
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education [SAF2007-66270]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2009-07489]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Method: We investigated the progression of cognitive and cerebral changes in 30 patients with a first-ever lacunar infarct (LI): 15 with vascular mild cognitive impairment (MCI-V) and 15 without cognitive impairment. All cases were followed up 18 +/- 6 months after the stroke and underwent neurological, neuropsychological and MRI assessments at baseline and longitudinally. Results: Differences in the changes in cognitive function over time were observed between the 2 groups, with the MCI-V patients showing slight memory improvements and frontal-lobe-related test impairments from baseline to follow-up evaluations. At baseline, the 2 groups presented similar white matter hyper-intensity (WMH) ratings and whole brain gray matter (GM) volumes, and at the follow-up evaluations, both groups had increased WMH lesions and decreased GM volumes; no statistical differences between groups were found. In contrast, a voxel-based morphometry analysis revealed that only MCI-V patients presented clear regional GM volume losses between the first and the second evaluations in cortical (frontal and temporal) and subcortical (pons, cerebellum and caudate) regions. Conclusion: Frontal lobe dysfunction and regional cortical and subcortical GM atrophy best differentiate the clinical course of LI patients with and without cognitive impairment. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available