4.3 Article

Feasibility of minocycline and doxycycline use as potential vasculostatic therapy for brain vascular malformations: Pilot study of adverse events and tolerance

Journal

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 25, Issue 1-2, Pages 157-163

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000113733

Keywords

brain vascular malformations; doxycycline; minocycline; tolerability; vasculostatic therapy

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS034949-12, R01 NS034949, NS34949, R01 NS055876] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS055876, R01NS034949] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tetracyclines may be useful in preventing pathological vascular remodeling, thus decreasing the risk of spontaneous hemorrhage from brain vascular malformations. Methods: Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and intracranial aneurysm patients undergoing noninvasive management were treated with minocycline or doxycycline (200 mg/day) up to 2 years in a prospective open-label safety pilot trial. The primary outcome was to compare dose-limiting intolerance, defined as treatment-related dose reduction or withdrawal between the agents. Results: Twenty-six patients with AVMs (n = 12) or aneurysms (n = 14) were recruited. Adverse event rates were similar to other reported trials of these agents; 4 of 13 (31%) minocycline and 3 of 13 (23%) doxycycline patients had dose-limiting intolerance (hazard ratio = 3.1, 95% CI = 0.52-18.11, log rank p = 0.70). Conclusions: It is feasible to propose a long-term trial to assess the potential benefit of tetracycline therapy to decrease hemorrhagic risk in brain vascular malformations. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available