4.6 Article

Large-Scale Brain Networks of the Human Left Temporal Pole: A Functional Connectivity MRI Study

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 680-702

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht260

Keywords

anterior temporal lobe; brain anatomy; cytoarchitecture; language; resting-state fMRI

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [P50-AG005134]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R21-NS077059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most rostral portion of the human temporal cortex, the temporal pole (TP), has been described as enigmatic because its functional neuroanatomy remains unclear. Comparative anatomy studies are only partially helpful, because the human TP is larger and cytoarchitectonically more complex than in nonhuman primates. Considered by Brodmann as a single area (BA 38), the human TP has been recently parceled into an array of cytoarchitectonic subfields. In order to clarify the functional connectivity of subregions of the TP, we undertook a study of 172 healthy adults using resting-state functional connectivity MRI. Remarkably, a hierarchical cluster analysis performed to group the seeds into distinct subsystems according to their large-scale functional connectivity grouped 87.5% of the seeds according to the recently described cytoarchitectonic subregions of the TP. Based on large-scale functional connectivity, there appear to be 4 major subregions of the TP: 1) dorsal, with predominant connectivity to auditory/somatosensory and language networks; 2) ventromedial, predominantly connected to visual networks; 3) medial, connected to paralimbic structures; and 4) anterolateral, connected to the default-semantic network. The functional connectivity of the human TP, far more complex than its known anatomic connectivity in monkey, is concordant with its hypothesized role as a cortical convergence zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available