4.6 Article

Vibrotactile Discrimination in the Rat Whisker System is Based on Neuronal Coding of Instantaneous Kinematic Cues

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 1093-1106

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht305

Keywords

head-fixed rat; neuronal coding; primary somatosensory cortex; psychophysics; tactile perception

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHW577/10-2]
  2. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [CRCNS 01GQ1113]
  3. Hertie Foundation
  4. Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Which physical parameter of vibrissa deflections is extracted by the rodent tactile system for discrimination? Particularly, it remains unclear whether perception has access to instantaneous kinematic parameters (i.e., the details of the trajectory) or relies on temporally integration of the movement trajectory such as frequency (e.g., spectral information) and intensity (e.g., mean speed). Here, we use a novel detection of change paradigm in head-fixed rats, which presents pulsatile vibrissa stimuli in seamless sequence for discrimination. This procedure ensures that processes of decision making can directly tap into sensory signals (no memory functions involved). We find that discrimination performance based on instantaneous kinematic cues far exceeds the ones provided by frequency and intensity. Neuronal modeling based on barrel cortex single units shows that small populations of sensitive neurons provide a transient signal that optimally fits the characteristic of the subject's perception. The present study is the first to show that perceptual read-out is superior in situations allowing the subject to base perception on detailed trajectory cues, that is, instantaneous kinematic variables. A possible impact of this finding on tactile systems of other species is suggested by evidence for instantaneous coding also in primates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available