4.6 Article

Testing Promotes Long-Term Learning via Stabilizing Activation Patterns in a Large Network of Brain Areas

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 3025-3035

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht158

Keywords

fMRI; forgetting; long-term learning; retrieval; testing effect

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO 3918/1-1, 1-2, 2-1]
  2. OTKA (Hungarian National Science Foundation) [K84019]
  3. New Hungary Development Plan [TAMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The testing effect refers to the phenomenon that repeated retrieval of memories promotes better long-term retention than repeated study. To investigate the neural correlates of the testing effect, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging methods while participants performed a cued recall task. Prior to the neuroimaging experiment, participants learned Swahili-German word pairs, then half of the word pairs were repeatedly studied, whereas the other half were repeatedly tested. For half of the participants, the neuroimaging experiment was performed immediately after the learning phase; a 1-week retention interval was inserted for the other half of the participants. We found that a large network of areas identified in a separate 2-back functional localizer scan were active during the final recall of the word pair associations. Importantly, the learning strategy (retest or restudy) of the word pairs determined the manner in which the retention interval affected the activations within this network. Recall of previously restudied memories was accompanied by reduced activation within this network at long retention intervals, but no reduction was observed for previously retested memories. We suggest that retrieval promotes learning via stabilizing cue-related activation patterns in a network of areas usually associated with cognitive and attentional control functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available