4.6 Article

Effects of Age, Task Performance, and Structural Brain Development on Face Processing

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1630-1642

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs150

Keywords

Brain development; Cortical specialization; Developmental neuroimaging; Face processing

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. ESRC [ES/H005412/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. MRC [G0701484] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H005412/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this combined structural and functional MRI developmental study, we tested 48 participants aged 7-37 years on 3 simple face-processing tasks (identity, expression, and gaze task), which were designed to yield very similar performance levels across the entire age range. The same participants then carried out 3 more difficult out-of-scanner tasks, which provided in-depth measures of changes in performance. For our analysis we adopted a novel, systematic approach that allowed us to differentiate age- from performance-related changes in the BOLD response in the 3 tasks, and compared these effects to concomitant changes in brain structure. The processing of all face aspects activated the core face-network across the age range, as well as additional and partially separable regions. Small task-specific activations in posterior regions were found to increase with age and were distinct from more widespread activations that varied as a function of individual task performance (but not of age). Our results demonstrate that activity during face-processing changes with age, and these effects are still observed when controlling for changes associated with differences in task performance. Moreover, we found that changes in white and gray matter volume were associated with changes in activation with age and performance in the out-of-scanner tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available