4.6 Article

The Extrinsic and Intrinsic Functional Architectures of the Human Brain Are Not Equivalent

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 223-229

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs010

Keywords

evoked activity; fMRI; functional connectivity; resting state; spontaneous activity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH083246]
  2. Autism Speaks
  3. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  4. Leon Levy Foundation
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH083246] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain's intrinsic functional architecture, revealed in correlated spontaneous activity, appears to constitute a faithful representation of its repertoire of evoked, extrinsic functional interactions. Here, using broad task contrasts to probe evoked patterns of coactivation, we demonstrate tight coupling between the brain's intrinsic and extrinsic functional architectures for default and task-positive regions, but not for subcortical and limbic regions or for primary sensory and motor cortices. While strong correspondence likely reflects persistent or recurrent patterns of evoked coactivation, weak correspondence may exist for regions whose patterns of evoked functional interactions are more adaptive and context dependent. These findings were independent of task. For tight task contrasts (e.g., incongruent vs. congruent trials), evoked patterns of coactivation were unrelated to the intrinsic functional architecture, suggesting that high-level task demands are accommodated by context-specific modulations of functional interactions. We conclude that intrinsic approaches provide only a partial understanding of the brain's functional architecture. Appreciating the full repertoire of dynamic neural responses will continue to require task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available