4.6 Article

Effects of interactions between powder particle size and binder viscosity on agglomerate growth mechanisms in a high shear mixer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 297-309

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(00)00182-2

Keywords

melt agglomeration; high shear mixer; binder viscosity; powder particle size; polyethylene glycols; agglomerate growth mechanisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was performed in order to elucidate the effects: of the interactions between powder particle size and binder viscosity on the mechanisms involved in agglomerate formation and growth. Calcium carbonates having mean particle sizes in the range of 5-214 mum and polyethylene glycols having viscosities in the range of approximately 50-100 000 mPas were melt agglomerated in a high shear mixer. Agglomerate growth by nucleation and coalescence was found to dominate when agglomerating small powder particles and binders with a low viscosity. Increasing the binder viscosity increased the formation of agglomerates by immersion of powder particles in the surface of the binder droplets. With a larger powder particle size, an increasing binder viscosity was necessary in order to obtain an agglomerate strength being sufficient to avoid breakage, Due to a low agglomerate strength, a satisfying agglomeration of very large particles (214 mum) could not be obtained. even with very viscous binders. The study demonstrated that the optimum agglomerate growth occurred when the agglomerates were of an intermediate strength causing an intermediate deformability of the agglomerates. In order to produce spherical agglomerates (pellets), a low viscosity binder has to be chosen when agglomerating a powder with a small particle size, and a high viscosity binder must be applied in agglomeration of powders with large particles. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available