Journal
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 22-26Publisher
JAPANESE DERMATOLGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2001.tb00081.x
Keywords
tinea capitis; etiology; griseofulvin; therapy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
There is a paucity of literature on tinea capitis from North India. The response to griseofulvin has not been studied as well. We studied 153 consecutive patients of tinea capitis for clinical patterns, causative dermatophytic species, clinico-etiological correlation, and response to griseofulvin. Culture and sensitivity were done on all patients. All patients were treated with griseofulvin for 6-8 weeks; non-responders were further treated with fluconazole. Ninety percent of the patients were less than 15 years of age, 75% belonged to poor socioeconomic groups and 19% had a family history of tinea capitis. The seborrheic variant was the commonest clinical pattern seen in 47.8% of patients, followed by grey patch, black dot, kerion, and alopecia-areata-like tinea capitis in 35.9%, 8.5%, 6.5%, and 1.3% of patients, respectively. Only 66% of patients had a positive culture. T: violaceum was the commonest dermatophytic species isolated in 38% patients. M. audoninii, T: schoenleinii, T. tonsurans, M. gypseum, T. verrucosum and T: mentagrophytes were isolated in 34%, 10%, 9%, 3%, 3% and 3% of patients, respectively. Of the isolates 94% were susceptible to griseofulvin, and 100% were susceptible to fluconazole. By using griseofulvin for 6-8 weeks 97.4% of the patients were cured; nonresponders required therapy with fluconazole for cure. To conclude, tinea capitis is still a disease of younger people of poor socioeconomic status. T. violaceum and M. audouinii are the most common responsible dermatophytes. The response to griseofulvin was excellent, and it should be used as a first line therapy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available