4.6 Article

The Truth about Lying: Inhibition of the Anterior Prefrontal Cortex Improves Deceptive Behavior

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 205-213

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp090

Keywords

frontal cortex; lie detection; moral cognition; neuroethics; skin-conductance response (SCR); transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Volkswagen Foundation
  3. European Platform for Life Sciences, Mind Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent neuroimaging studies have indicated a predominant role of the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) in deception and moral cognition, yet the functional contribution of the aPFC to deceptive behavior remains unknown. We hypothesized that modulating the excitability of the aPFC by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could reveal its functional contribution in generating deceitful responses. Forty-four healthy volunteers participated in a thief role-play in which they were supposed to steal money and then to attend an interrogation with the Guilty Knowledge Test. During the interrogation, participants received cathodal, anodal, or sham tDCS. Remarkably, inhibition of the aPFC by cathodal tDCS did not lead to an impairment of deceptive behavior but rather to a significant improvement. This effect manifested in faster reaction times in telling lies, but not in telling the truth, a decrease in sympathetic skin-conductance response and feelings of guilt while deceiving the interrogator and a significantly higher lying quotient reflecting skillful lying. Increasing the excitability of the aPFC by anodal tDCS did not affect deceptive behavior, confirming the specificity of the stimulation polarity. These findings give causal support to recent correlative data obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging studies indicating a pivotal role of the aPFC in deception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available