4.3 Article

Isolation, maintenance, and characterization of human pancreatic islet tumor cells expressing vasoactive intestinal peptide

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 91-98

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200101000-00016

Keywords

pancreatic endocrine tumor; human cell line; gastrointestinal peptides

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK034987, R29DK049860, R01DK052851] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R29 DK49860, R01-DK52851, DK34987] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue from a vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)secreting human tumor has been used to establish and characterize human neuroendocrine primary cell cultures from which permanent, clone-derived cell lines have been established. Viable cells were obtained by enzymatic and mechanical dissociation of freshly resected pancreatic islet tumor and hepatic metastatic tumor tissues. Aliquots of tumor cells were established ex vivo under culture conditions including porous substrata coated with type IV collagen and laminin and a low serum, hormonally defined culture medium. The small (<10 m) rounded, grape-like cells had a very slow growth rate of doubling times estimated at several weeks or more. After several passages, morphologically uniform cells were derived that strongly expressed neuroendocrine markers of synaptophysin and synaptobrevin. Although chromogranin A and VIP had somewhat weaker expression, both demonstrated phorbol ester-stimulated secretion. The morphologic and secretory properties were maintained by the cells for nearly 2 years in culture. The establishment of this novel VIP-secreting human neuroendocrine cell line (HuNET) makes available a culture model with which to study a transformed version of this pancreatic islet cell type and offers approaches by which to establish islet tumor cell lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available